DISSINTER

SB 269 — Maryland

Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills

Establishing a rebuttable presumption in an action for personal injury or wrongful death that a medical bill from a health care provider or an agent of the health care provider is authentic, fair, and reasonable if the bill was properly provided in discovery; and establishing that a party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical bill, or any charge in a medical bill, is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable.

Latest action: Hearing 2/03 at 2:00 p.m. · Jan 27, 2026

In committeeCivil ActionsCivil Actions and ProceduresDeathEvidenceHealth Care FacilitiesHealth OccupationsInjuryRecords

Synopsis written by the legislature's own staff, as published on the official bill page. Status label is derived from the recorded actions. The full text below is the record.

Committees: Judicial Proceedings (Senate)

Updated Mar 17, 2026

Timeline

  1. First Reading Judicial Proceedings

    Jan 19, 2026 · Senate

  2. Hearing 2/03 at 1:00 p.m.

    Jan 20, 2026 · Senate

  3. Hearing canceled

    Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

  4. Hearing 2/03 at 2:00 p.m.

    Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

Sponsored by Shaneka Henson

No recorded floor votes yet.

Fiscal and Policy Note — official analysis by legislative staff (PDF) Bill text (First reading) — Maryland General Assembly (PDF) Official record — Maryland General Assembly bill page

Official records. Maryland legislators, bills and roll-call votes from the Maryland General Assembly, imported through Open States on Oct 27, 2026 (partial import — not yet the full session). Accuracy review against the official site is still under way. Campaign-finance records for Maryland are not imported yet.